Justice L. Nageswara Rao (From the judgment in Madras Bar Association v. Union Of India & Anr. (2020))

Supreme Court Legal News Seizure of the goods ipso facto does not mean that the accused had conscious knowledge about their illicit nature or origin: SC negates the interpretation of Section 69 presumption under Forest Act which places reverse burden of proof in respect of an offence. Bharath Booshan Aggarwal v. State Of Kerala Decided on 06th October, 2021 For full textclick here

Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai v. Ankita Sinha and Ors. Decided on 07th October, 2021 For full textclick here

Judicial independence of the Tribunals can be achieved only when the Tribunals are provided the necessary infrastructure and other facilities without having to lean on the shoulders of the executive. Justice L. Nageswara Rao Madras Bar Association v. Union Of India & Anr. (2020)

For the purpose of passing a decree for specific performance, readiness and willingness has to be established and proved. :SC held affidavit filed in a first appeal showing readiness and willingness without amending the plaint and pleadings cannot be relied upon by the High Court. K. Karuppuraj v. M. Ganesan Decided on 04th October, 2021 For full textclick here