[CPC] Executing Court cannot decide questions of title set up by third parties who assert independent title in themselves.: SC on scope of enquiry under Order XXI, Rules 97 to 101 [Evidence Act] No custody of document is improper if it is proved to have had a legitimate origin or the circumstances of the particular case are such as to render such an origin probable.: SC answers the contention that presumption under Section 90 will apply only when an original document is produced and only after...

[Child custody] In child custody matters welfare aspect to be considered first and morality created by society should not reflect in a contextual relationship between a parent and child.: Kerala HC frowns upon invoking morality principles by the Family Court Aneesa F v. Shefeekmon K.I A.Muhamed Mustaque, Sophy Thomas, JJ Decided on 8th June, 2023 For full textclick here/p>

A claim petition or objection filed before confirmation of sale will not be hit by proviso (a) to Order 21 Rule 58(1) of CPC.: Kerala HC explains when a property under attachment can be said to be ‘sold’ Thankam v. Remani A.Muhamed Mustaque & Sophy Thomas, JJ Decided on 6th June, 2023 For full judgmentclick here

[CPC] Parties cannot trade in on the basis of a mere declaration of the rights that take place under the preliminary decree in a suit for partition.: SC [Evidence Act] No custody of document is improper if it is proved to have had a legitimate origin or the circumstances of the particular case are such as to render such an origin probable.: SC answers the contention that presumption under Section 90 will apply only when an original document is produced and only after it is proved that it has c...

[Consumer Protection] Theft en route a train journey cannot be deficiency in service: SC observed railways not responsible if passengers cannot take care of their belongings. Station Superintendent V. Surender Bhola Vikram Nath & Ahsanuddin Amanullah, JJ. Decided on 15th June, 2023 For Full Jdgment: "Click Here"